Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 505 F.3d 1306 - Greer v. Paulson

Greer v. Paulson’s Empirical Analysis

505 F.3d 1306 · 2007

Citation profile

122
cited by 122 later decisions
July 2021
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 93 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 122 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Steele v. Schafer (2008), Stewart v. Mississippi Transportation Commission (2009)

13 federal appellate · 93 district ·

970200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc. · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 122 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the non-moving party must produce evidence capable of being converted into admissible evidence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We join our sister circuits in rejecting a per se rule against considering incidents alleged to have occurred while an employee was physically absent from the workplace.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.