Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

505 F.3d 1323

Docket No. 07-3234.

Lynn v. Rogers

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 6, 2007.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2007-11-06

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 2011

1 federal appellate ·

5 counsel of record

Relies on Wallie W. Mattice, and Paul Rhodes v. Clarence A. H. Meyer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-11-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Patrick C. Lynn, El Dorado, KS, pro se.

¶2Charles M. Rogers, Wyrsch Hobbs & Mirakian, Kansas City, MO, pro se.

¶3Stephen G. Mirakian, Wyrsch, Atwell, Mirakian, Lee & Hobbs, Kansas City, MO, pro se.

¶4Linden G. Appel, Topeka, KS, pro se.

¶5Martha M. Snyder, Assistant Attorney General, Trevin Erik Wray, Topeka, KS, for Linden Appel and Julie St. Peter.

¶6Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, HENRY and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

¶7ORDER

¶8This is an appeal from a district court order dismissing appellant’s disciplinary complaints against four attorneys, Charles Rogers, Stephen G. Mirakian, Linden Ap-pel, and Julie St. Peter, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration.

¶9A private citizen does not have standing to initiate or maintain a disciplinary proceeding, or to appeal if a court declines to discipline an attorney. See, e.g., Mattice v. Meyer, 353 F.2d 316 (8th Cir.1965).

¶10This appeal is DISMISSED.

/505/f3d/1323 · .json · Public domain