SPGGC, LLC v. Blumenthal’s Empirical Analysis
505 F.3d 183 · 2007
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Connection Distributing Co. v. Holder (2009), Pacific Capital Bank, N.A. v. Connecticut (2008)
11 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 21 · 12 U.S.C. § 24 · 12 U.S.C. § 24A · 12 U.S.C. § 481 · 12 U.S.C. § 93A
Relies on Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Fidelity Federal Savings and Loan Association v. D Cuesta · Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton · Southern Pac Co v. State of Arizona Sullivan · Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“compliance with both state and federal law is impossible,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“And because consumer protection is a field traditionally subject to state regulation, '[courts] should be particularly hesitant to interfere with [a] State's efforts [to protect consumers] under the guise of the [dormant] Commerce Clause.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Federal preemption of a state statute can be express or implied, and generally occurs: [1] where Congress has expressly preempted state law, [2] where Congress has legislated so comprehensively that federal law occupies an entire field of regulation and leaves no room for state law, or [3] where federal law conflicts with state law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.