Cherry Hill Vineyard, LLC v. Baldacci’s Empirical Analysis
505 F.3d 28 · 2007
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably Family Winemakers v. Jenkins (2010), Freeman v. Corzine (2010)
9 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. · City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey · Hughes v. Oklahoma
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]ncidental purpose, like incidental effect, cannot suffice to trigger strict scrutiny under the dormant Commerce Clause.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[P]laintiffs have adduced no evidence that would in any way undermine the plausible impression that Maine consumers (like imbibers everywhere) view trips to a winery as a distinct experience incommensurate with — and, therefore, unlikely to be replaced by — a trip to either a mailbox or a retail liquor store. Nor have they offered evidence to impeach the suggestion, made in one of the cases on which they rely, that bottles of wine are unique and, thus, unlikely to be perceived by consumers as interchangeable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[A] plaintiff bringing a dormant commerce clause challenge based exclusively on the allegedly discriminatory effect of a statutory scheme is required to submit some probative evidence of adverse impact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.