United States v. Codarcea’s Empirical Analysis
505 F.3d 68 · 2007
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028A · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on United States v. Pizarro-Berríos · United States v. Robinson · United States v. LaCroix · United States v. Alli
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the amount of loss attributable to, or reasonably foreseeable by, a defendant, and may not rely solely on what was charged in the jointly undertaken criminal activity count of an indictment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.