Berkovitz v. Minnesota’s Empirical Analysis
505 F.3d 827 · 2007
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Rock v. Arkansas · United States of America v. Willie James Richardson · Brown v. Artuz · United States v. Janoe · United States v. Leggett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court, on the record, made sure that [the defendant] understood that she had both the right to testify and the right to remain silent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. U.S. v. Tull-Abreu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.