Day v. Apoliona’s Empirical Analysis
505 F.3d 963 · 2007
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Katuria E. Smith v. Tyson Marsh · Forest Conservation Council v. United States Forest Service · United States v. Alisal Water Corp. · Greene v. United States · United States v. City of Los Angeles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) it has a significant protectable interest relating to the subject of the action; (2) the disposition of the action may, as a practical matter, impair or impede its ability to protect its interest; (3) the application is timely; and (4) the existing parties may not adequately represent its interest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Hawaii could have and should have intervened earlier....”). 4 . In full, this part of the statute ends”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Day v. Apoliona
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.