¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
¶3Michelle D. Pharr appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Pharr v. Jain, No. 2:12-cv-00007-BO (E.D.N.C. July 28, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶4 AFFIRMED.