505 F. Supp. 2d 1120 - Moss v. Kopp’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. · Stump v. Sparkman · Sutton II v. Utah State School for the Deaf and Blind 1-5 1-5 · Miller v. Glanz · Mitchell v. King
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Because of the limited relief sought by this motion and the possibility that evi dence may be destroyed or altered upon notice of this action, it is appropriate for the Court to hear and issue this order ex parte. 3. The Salt Lake County Sheriffs Office ... is directed, with the assistance of Iomed, to execute this Order at the residence [of Yanaki] and to do the following: (a) take custody of each of the hard drives in one or more computers, of other electronic storage media, including specifically but not limited to ZIP drives and CD ROMS, and of the electronic day planner (a Palm Pilot) in the possession, custody or control of Defendant Jamal Yanaki [at Ya-naki’s residence]; (b) supervise the copying of information from the [above property] by the computer expert provided by Iomed and to return such copy to Yanaki; (c)file the original [property] under seal with the Court....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moss v. Kopp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.