Captain & Co., Inc. v. Stenberg’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably Kilduff v. Adams, Inc. (1991), Scott v. Bodor, Inc. (1991)
7 federal appellate · 42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lightheiser · Thornton Ex Rel. Thornton v. Pender · Eby v. York-Division, Borg-Warner · 171 Ind. App. 315 - Charlie Stuart Oldsmobile, Inc. v. Smith · Plymale v. Upright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The damage must be the proximate consequence of the injured party's reliance on the fraudulent representations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] person relying upon an uncured or incurable deceptive act may bring an action for the damages actually suffered as a consumer as a result of the deceptive act. The court may award reasonable attorney fees to the party that prevails in an action under this subsection. This subsection does not apply to a consumer transaction in real property, except for purchases of time shares and camping club memberships.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pierce v. Drees“If a party desires a full and specific instruction as to what the issues are, it is incumbent on him to prepare such and present the same to the court at the proper time, with a proper request that it be given. If he fails to do so [ ] he has no grounds to complain that the court did not state the issues to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.