Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Nealy v. State (1981), Johnson v. State (1976)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 69 Cal. 2d 765 - People v. Chacon · Fryar v. United States · Fryar v. United States · Carter v. State · 79 Okla. Crim. 151 - Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is settled law in Oklahoma that where no demurrer, or motion to quash the information is filed, and a plea of 'not guilty' is entered and the trial is had, the defendant waives any defect in the information, except that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter and that no public offense has been committed.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Metoyer v. State · King v. State““The record further reflects that appellant Wright’s newly-hired attorney made no effort to comply with the statutory requirements fundamental to a motion for continuance. 22 O.S.1971, § 584; 12 O.S.1971, § 668. We have previously held that the failure of an affidavit for continuance to comply with the requirements of § 668, supra, renders a request for continuance fatally defective. Snow v. State, Okl.Cr., 453 P.2d 274 (1969); Crosswhite v. State, Okl.Cr., 317 P.2d 781 (1957). . . ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wartson v. State“accompanied by immediate power of execution”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. TERRY v. DRUMMOND
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.