Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 505 P2D 995 - Box v. State

Box v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
June 1988
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Roberts v. State · 18 Okla. Crim. 480 - Cheeves v. State · Valenti v. State · McMahan v. State · Roberts v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . It is the fundamental rule that where there is evidence, although circumstantial, from which the jury may reasonably and logically find the defendant guilty, the weight, credibility, and probative effect of such evidence is for the jury, and the Court of Criminal Appeals will not disturb the verdict for insufficiency of the evidence. Roberts v. State, Okl.Cr., 479 P.2d 623, 624 (1971).””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.