Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

505 So. 2d 18

505 So.2d 18

12 Fla.L.Weekly 944

Zock v. Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-04-07

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1988

1 state decisions

Relies on Fisher and Fisher v. Payne · Seibel v. Kemble · 264 So. 2d 873 - Cawthon v. Coffer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-04-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mouhamed ZOCK, As Personal Representative of the Estates of Hassan Zock and Heide Zock, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
Lloyd R. MILLER, M.D., University of Miami, and Dade County Public Health Trust D/B/a Jackson Memorial Hospital, Appellees.

Nos. 85-2373, 85-2374, 85-2806 and 86-174.

¶1District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 7, 1987.

¶2*19 Gerald E. Rosser, Miami, for appellant.

¶3Robert A. Ginsburg, Co. Atty. and Stephen J. Keating, Asst. Co. Atty., Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and Steven E. Stark, Miami, for appellees.

¶4Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6In Florida a psychiatrist appointed by the court to examine a criminally accused enjoys quasi-judicial immunity from liability where he, based on an examination, erroneously determines that the accused, if released on bail, would pose no harm to others. See Fisher v. Payne,93 Fla. 1085, 113 So. 378 (1927); Cawthon v. Coffer,264 So.2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972). See also Seibel v. Kemble,63 Haw. 516, 631 P.2d 173 (1981) (reasons underlying judicial immunity apply to court-appointed psychiatrists).

¶7Affirmed.

/505/so2d/18 · .json · Public domain