¶1The summary judgment below is reversed because the plaintiff-movant did not conclusively obviate the affirmative defense of fraud. See Nagelbush v. United Postal Savings Ass’n, 504 So.2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Holly Hill Acres, Ltd. v. Charter Bank, 314 So.2d 209 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); see also Aroll v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp., 496 So.2d 1011 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); O’Neal v. Brady, 476 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Proprietors Ins. v. Siegel, 410 So.2d 993 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
505 So. 2d 22
505 So.2d 22
12 Fla.L.Weekly 951
Anderson v. Redden
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 7, 1987
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-04-07
Relies on 476 So. 2d 294 - Celotex Corp. v. Buildex, Inc. · 410 So. 2d 993 - Foust v. State · 314 So. 2d 209 - Holly Hill Acres Ltd. v. Charter Bk. of Gainesville
Decided 1987-04-07