505 So. 2d 418 - Ramos v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2016
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Wilson · 293 So. 2d 44 - Lynch v. State · Alford v. Florida · Pulliam v. Georgia · 313 So. 2d 666 - Simkins Industries, Inc. v. Moreira
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The state may appeal from: (a)- An order dismissing an indictment or information or any count thereof or dismissing an affidavit charging the commission of a criminal offense, -the violation of probation, the violation of community control, or the violation of any supervised correctional release. (b) An order granting a new trial. (c) An order arresting judgment. (d) A ruling on a question of law when the defendant is convicted and appeals from the judgment. Once the state’s cross-appeal' is instituted, the appellate court shall review and rule upon the question raised by the state regardless of the disposition of the defendant’s appeal. (e) The sentence, on the ground that it is illegal (f) A judgment discharging a prisoner on habeas corpus. (g) An order adjudicating a defendant insane under the Florida Rulés of Criminal Procedure. (h) All other pretrial orders, except that it may not take more than one appeal under this subsection in any case. (i) A sentence imposed below the lowest permissible sentence established by the Criminal Punishment Code under chapter 921. (j) A ruling granting a motion for judgment of acquittal after a jury verdict. (k) An order denying restitution under s. 775.089. (l) An order or ruling suppressing evidence or evidence in limine at trial. (m) An order withholding adjudication of guilt in violation of s. 775.08435.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“at the close of the evidence for the state or at the close of all the evidence in the cause ... [that] the evidence is insufficient to warrant a conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“where the cross-appellant could not have initially appealed... the cross-appeal depends entirely on the existence of an appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.