Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 505 So. 2d 555 - Masvidal v. Ochoa

505 So. 2d 555 - Masvidal v. Ochoa’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 2013

16 state decisions

1301987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Purcell v. Deli Man, Inc. · 494 So. 2d 1143 - Lambrix v. State · Jones v. State · Skylight Corp. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco · 486 So. 2d 623 - Rosen v. Marlin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Moreover, we are not persuaded by the argument that no civil theft or conversion occurred in this case because there was a contractual relationship between the parties. The evidence shows a classic embezzlement by the defendant of an escrow fund set up under a subscription agreement between the parties. That is, the defendant lawfully obtained possession of the plaintiff's funds to set up the escrow fund and thereafter converted the funds for his own use. This being so, the defendant, by his actions, committed an embezzlement, a civil theft and a conversion as well as a breach of contract... . We do not read Rosen ... to preclude this result... .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.