Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

505 So. 2d 616

505 So.2d 616

12 Fla.L.Weekly 1030

C.P. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-04-14

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 1988

5 state decisions

Relies on 444 So. 2d 407 - Marty v. State · 435 So. 2d 304 - Muwwakil v. State · Franklin v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-04-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

¶1C.P. was adjudicated delinquent based on separate findings of possessing, § 893.-13(l)(e), Fla.Stat. (1985), and possessing with intent to sell, § 893.13(l)(a), Fla.Stat. (1985), the same quantity of less than 20 grams of cannabis.

¶2Under double jeopardy principles, both convictions cannot stand and the adjudication of the lesser offense of simple possession is therefore vacated. Murray v. State, 464 So.2d 622 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Rodriguez v. State, 395 So.2d 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); see Muwwakil v. State, 435 So.2d 304 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 444 So.2d 417 (Fla.1984).

¶3We agree with the trial court that the remaining .charge of possession with intent to sell is a third degree felony rather than a first degree misdemeanor. In reaching this conclusion, we follow State v. McGee, 494 So.2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) and State v. McDaniel, (Fla. 2d DCA Case no. 86-1355, opinion filed, February 25, 1987) [12 FLW 658], rather than the directly contrary decision of Franklin v. State, 346 So.2d 137 (Fla. *6171st DCA 1977), with which we acknowledge a direct conflict.

¶4Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

/505/so2d/616 · .json · Public domain