Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

505 So. 2d 659

505 So.2d 659

12 Fla.L.Weekly 1065

Ahnin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-04-15

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1991

6 state decisions

Relies on Leone v. Palmacci

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The appellant, Vernroy Ahnin, was charged by grand jury indictment with two violations of the Florida Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO). Specifically, Ahnin was charged in Count I of the indictment with violation of RICO and in Count II with criminal conspiracy to violate RICO. He was not charged, as were a number of the co-defendants, in Counts III and IV of the indictment.

¶2Ahnin was sentenced, however, for each of the four counts contained in the indictment. He is correct in asserting that he cannot be sentenced for crimes for which he was not convicted. Moreover, the sentence entered must conform to the oral pronouncement of the trial court. Thomas v. State, 504 So.2d 20 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

¶3Accordingly, we remand for correction of Ahnin’s written sentence.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.
/505/so2d/659 · .json · Public domain