Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 505 SW2D 878 - Coleman v. State

Coleman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2013

17 state decisions

8019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · United States v. Sutherland · Campbell v. State · Hulsey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[We] hold that such [a] case must be considered on its own facts, and that convictions based on eyewitness identifications at trial following a pretrial identification by photograph will be set aside on that ground only if the photographic identification procedure was so impermis-sibly suggestive as to give rise to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misiden-tification.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.