Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 505 S.W.2d 887 - Moore v. State

Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2011

15 state decisions

10019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Jackson v. Denno · Lopez v. State · Phenix v. State · Butler v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n all cases where a question is raised as to the voluntariness of a statement of an accused ...”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Moon v. State · Wicker v. State
  2. ““[T]he trial court has the duty, even in the absence of a specific request for a hearing, to respond to an objection to the voluntariness of a confession by holding a hearing on the issue and making express findings of fact and conclusions of law that decide the issue.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Ross v. State · Saenz v. State
  3. ““(b) Notwithstanding any of the provisions of Subsection (a) of this section, the statement of a child is admissible in evidence in any future proceeding concerning the matter about which the statement was given if: “(2) it be made orally and the child makes a statement of facts or circumstances that are found to be true, which conduct tends to establish his guilt, such as the finding of secreted or stolen property, or the instrument with which he states the offense was committed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Meza v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.