Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

505 S.W.3d 344

Perkins v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 2016

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2016-11-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2017

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2016-11-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Reginald Perkins appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motions to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rules 24.0351 and 29.15.2 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rules 24.035(k) and 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

¶3. Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013.

¶4. Mo. R. Crim. P. 2012.

/505/sw3d/344 · .json · Public domain