Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 505 SW3D 749 - Barber v. Bradley

Barber v. Bradley’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Califano v. Sanders · 194 W. Va. 263 - Burnside v. Burnside · Moore v. Asente · Rowland v. Holt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he basic rationale of the ripeness requirement is 'to prevent the courts, through the avoidance of premature adjudication, from entangling themselves in abstract disagreements[.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.