Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 506 F.2d 849 - A. C. Park v. H. T. (Tommy) Huff

A. C. Park v. H. T. (Tommy) Huff’s Empirical Analysis

506 F.2d 849 · 1975

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2011 · most notably Ohio v. Roberts (1980), United States v. Oates (1977)

55 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions — followed in 10 states

52019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Pointer v. Texas · Pinkerton v. United States · Dutton v. Evans · Lutwak v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a showing of a likelihood of an illicit association between the declarant and the defendant,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The notion that the competency of the declarations of a confederate is confined to prosecutions for conspiracy has not the slightest basis; their admission does not depend upon the indictment, but is merely an incident of the general principle of agency that the acts of any agent, within the scope of his authority, are competent against his principal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.