Harris v. Chand’s Empirical Analysis
506 F.3d 1135 · 2007
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2023
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. · United States v. Pirani · Gray v. Lucas · Young v. Pummill · Rodgers v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Plain-error review permits reversal only if the error was so prejudicial as to have affected substantial rights resulting in a miscarriage of justice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t may be an abuse of the trial court’s discretion to exclude probative, non-cumulative evidence simply because its in troduction will cause delay, and any time limits formulated in advance of trial must be fashioned with this in mind. Such limits should be sufficiently flexible to accommodate adjustment if it appears during trial that the court’s initial assessment was too restrictive.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“A district court abuses its discretion if evidence of a critical nature is excluded and there is no reasonable assurance that the jury would have reached the same conclusion had the evidence been admitted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.