Crowe v. Marchand’s Empirical Analysis
506 F.3d 13 · 2007
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 36 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Cruz (2008), Commonwealth v. Avila (2009)
9 federal appellate · 36 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · General Electric Co. v. Joiner · Wilkinson v. Vesey · Sanchez v. Puerto Rico Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise, if (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The touchstone for the admission of expert testimony in federal court litigation is Federal Rule of Evidence 702.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the factual basis of an expert's testimony is called into question, the district court must determine whether the testimony has `a reliable basis' in light of the knowledge and experience of the relevant discipline.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.