Barajas v. Wise

Decided Oct. 22, 2007.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2007-10-22

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably United States v. Rodriguez (2013), United States of America v. Garcia (2010)

29 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Barajas v. Wise

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2007-10-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Jacob M. Weisberg, Law Office of Jacob M. Weisberg, Fresno, CA, for Petitioner-Appellee.

¶2R. Todd Marshall, Marcia A. Fay, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondenfi-Appel-lant.

¶3D.C. No. CV-02-06202-DLB, Eastern District of California, Fresno.

¶4Before: MYRON H. BRIGHT,* D.W. NELSON, and MARSHA S. BERZON, Circuit Judges.

¶6ORDER

¶7The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED.

¶8The opinion filed March 23, 2007, slip op. 3449, and published at 481 F.3d 734 (9th Cir.2007) is hereby vacated. The case has been resolved in an unpublished memorandum disposition.

¶9The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot.