¶1After a careful consideration of the record, the briefs, and the contentions urged by counsel at oral argument, we find the trial court did not commit error. We affirm the judgment on the authority of Mikos v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 497 So.2d 630 (Fla.1986), aff'g Mikos v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 475 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).
506 So. 2d 1138
Mikos v. Feld
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 8, 1987
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-05-08
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1988
2 state decisions
Relies on 497 So. 2d 630 - Mikos v. RINGLING BROS.-BARNUM & BAILEY · 475 So. 2d 292 - Mikos v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1987-05-08
View the full empirical analysis of this case →