Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 506 SO2D 167 - Common Cause v. Morial

Common Cause v. Morial’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1997
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 443 So. 2d 562 - City of New Orleans v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Acknowledging that the tape may be discoverable under the Public Records Statute as a public record of the Mayor's office, the trial judge pointed out that neither the Mayor nor the current Director of Public Information had possession of the tape and were unaware of its continued existence; therefore, the defendants were unable to tender the tape. The trial court held that since these facts were certified to the plaintiff as required by La.Rev.Stat. 44:34, plaintiff had no cause of action. We concur with the conclusions of the trial court [emphasis added] ...”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a discussion or active exchange of views.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.