Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 506 SO2D 277 - Reed v. State

Reed v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Taylor v. State (1996), 684 So. 2d 643 - Davis v. State (1996)

45 state decisions

2601987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Scott · 475 So. 2d 1136 - Johnson v. State · 419 So. 2d 194 - Clay Bohn Chrysler, Inc. v. Lizana · 449 So. 2d 766 - Winters v. State · Lightsey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test of whether an accused is prejudiced by the amendment of an indictment or information has been said to be whether or not a defense under the indictment or information as it originally stood would be equally available after the amendment is made and whether or not any evidence [the] accused might have would be equally applicable to the indictment or information in the one form as in the other; if the answer is in the affirmative, the amendment is one of form and not of substance.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 994 So. 2d 864 - Commodore v. State · 727 So. 2d 761 - Burrell v. State
  2. “If the defendant is the cause of the delay, he cannot complain thereafter.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Winder v. State · 678 So. 2d 683 - Simmons v. State
  3. “The State is required to make sure that such an order appears in the record and the defense is required to object to the absence of such order if it wishes to preserve this point for appeal.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. 938 So. 2d 277 - Fuqua v. State · 532 So. 2d 584 - Doby v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.