506 So. 2d 405 - State v. Tyner’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
32 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2004 · most notably 525 So. 2d 477 - Smith v. State (1988), 537 So. 2d 995 - Felts v. State (1989)
32 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 488 So. 2d 523 - State v. Mischler · 491 So. 2d 1228 - Tyner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[j]udges may consider only that conduct of the defendant relating to an element of the offense for which he has been convicted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Mayo v. State · Barr v. State“IS THE COURT PERMITTED TO CONSIDER ANY FACTORS RELATING TO THE INSTANT OFFENSE AS A BASIS FOR DEPARTURE FROM THE GUIDELINES IF SUCH FACTORS WOULD HAVE SUBJECTED THE DEFENDANT TO PROSECUTION FOR A CRIME OF WHICH HE HAS NOT BEEN CONVICTED?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stroud v. State“[r]easons for deviating from the guidelines shall not include factors relating to ... the instant offenses for which convictions have not been obtained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barr v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.