¶1We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand to the trial court for the purpose of eliminating from the probation order any requirement that appellant pay restitution for property for which he was not charged with having removed from the burglarized van. Fresneda v. State, 347 So.2d 1021 (Fla.1977).
506 So. 2d 479
506 So.2d 479
12 Fla.L.Weekly 1175
Riley v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 6, 1987
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-05-06
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1988
1 state decisions
Relies on 347 So. 2d 1021 - Fresneda v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1987-05-06
View the full empirical analysis of this case →