Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 506 SW2D 229 - Jackel v. State

Jackel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
June 1981
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Committee for Public Education & Religious Liberty v. Nyquist · Albrecht v. State · Lovely v. United States · Nicholas v. State · Talley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... Evidence of other crimes committed by the accused may be admitted, however, where such evidence is shown to be both material and relevant to a contested issue in the case.... Thus, before evidence of collateral crimes is admissible, a relationship between such evidence and the evidence necessary to prove that the accused committed the crime for which he stands charged must be shown...." It was also stated: "Evidence of extraneous offenses committed by the accused has been held admissible:... (3) To prove scienter, where intent or guilty knowledge is an essential element of the state's case and cannot be inferred from the act itself.... (6) To refute a defensive theory raised by the accused."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The fact that one woman was raped ... has no tendency to prove that another woman did not consent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.