Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 506 SW2D 441 - State v. Lovell

State v. Lovell’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably State v. Johnson (1976), State v. Hopkins (1985)

54 state decisions

22019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harris v. United States · Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. Zim Israel Navigation Co. · State v. Taylor · State v. Brown · State v. Land

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The only question in this case, Mr. Black, is whether or not you can give defendant a fair trial. Is there any reason why you cannot hear the evidence in the case and go by the instructions of the Court in deciding whether or not this defendant is guilty of the crime charged? ... Is there any reason why you cannot give this defendant a fair and impartial trial under the evidence and the law? JUROR BLACK: I don’t think so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The total examination shows doubt whether [the venireman] could have accorded defendant his right to an impartial trial. With such doubt present, the trial court should have excused him upon defendant’s challenge for cause; the failure to do so constitutes reversible error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.