Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 506 SW2D 749 - Finch v. State

Finch v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1983
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hines v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and the Court having heard the evidence offered by the State of Texas and having considered the same finds that within the period of said probation the child violated the terms and conditions thereof in the following particulars, to-wit: That Probationer M_H_has failed to pay restitution in the amount of $811.35 as ordered, and currently owes the full amount of $811.35 on said restitution. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the probation heretofore, granted to the child in this cause be and the same is hereby revoked; that the finding of delinquent conduct heretofore made in this cause be and the same hereby is made a final finding; and that said M-H-be and hereby is committed to the care, custody, and control of the Texas Youth Council.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"A disposition based on a finding that the child engaged in delinquent conduct may be modified so as to commit the child to the Texas Youth Council if the court after a hearing to modify disposition finds beyond a reasonable doubt that the child violated a reasonable and lawful order of the court."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “There is no requirement that the words `finds beyond a reasonable doubt' be incorporated into the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.