Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 BR 509 - In re Forde

In re Forde’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1304 · 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Heiser v. Woodruff · Paddington Partners v. Bouchard · Vienna Park Properties Vienna Park Properties v. United Postal Savings Association Fsb · In Re Eatman · In Re Raymond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Receivers are compensated pursuant to § 543(c).... If allowed, the Receiver’s fees and expenses are entitled to be treated as an administrative expense pursuant to § 503(b)(3)(E). It. is clear from the statute that Receivers who are excused from service by the Bankruptcy Court are entitled to fees for pre-petition services.... The only standard provided by § 543(c)(2) is reasonableness. The determination of what is reasonable is a determination of federal, not state, law.... The factors for determining reasonableness are similar to those used in considering other attorneys’ fees and include: the time and labor expended by the custodian; the benefit of the custodian’s services to the debtor and the estate; the size and/or complexity of the estate; what the custodian would have received if he or she had been appointed as trustee for the debtor, and the quality of the custodian’s services.... The Receiver may file a claim for his fees pursuant to § 503(b)(3)(E) and Debtor will have the opportunity to object.” In re Forde, 507 B.R. 509, 521 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014) (internal citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.