Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 F.2d 1186 - Wallace v. Lynn

Wallace v. Lynn’s Empirical Analysis

507 F.2d 1186 · 1974

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
2
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 16 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably Schuler v. United States (1979), Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Weinberger (1986)

55 federal appellate · 16 district · 3 state decisions

41019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Arnett v. Kennedy · Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · McKart v. United States · Sampson v. Murray · United States v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(T)he very fact that constitutional issues are put forward constitutes a strong reason for not allowing ... suit either to anticipate or to take the place of (agency action),”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Humana of South Carolina, Inc. v. Califano · Lawrence v. Staats
  2. “(i)t is well settled that resort to the judicial process must ordinarily be postponed until administrative remedies capable of rectifying claimed error have been pursued to finality.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Leefer v. Administrator, National Aeronautics & Space Administration
  3. “[i]nitiation and pursuit of the administrative process does not appear particularly burdensome, and in the usual case need not long delay judicial resolution, if necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Andrade v. Lauer

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.