Manning v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
507 F.2d 889 · 1974
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently February 2004 · most notably United States v. Franks (1975), Perry v. Rushen (1983)
34 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell · Lisenba v. People of State of California · McKeiver v. Pennsylvania · Moore v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[O]rdinarily habeas corpus ... is not considered to be a proper remedy for correcting errors in trial procedure.... It is only where trial error or irregularities infringe upon specific constitutional protection or are so prejudicial as to amount to a denial of due process that a justiciable federal issue is presented in a habeas corpus proceeding.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maggitt v. Wyrick · Byrd v. Wilson“To be consistent with due process, the other crime must be 'rationally connected' with the charged crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“permitting the states wide latitude in fashioning rules of evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Burden v. Zant · Burden v. Zant
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.