United States v. Jimenez’s Empirical Analysis
507 F.3d 13 · 2007
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably State v. Evans (2013), United States v. Dwinells (2007)
22 federal appellate · 7 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998) · 18 U.S.C. § 1028A · 18 U.S.C. § 1542 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 2332B (§ 702 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 1 U.S.C. § 1 (Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002) · 42 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 208 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Hughey v. United States · Richardson v. United States · Muscarello v. United States · Moskal v. United States · Commissioner v. Lundy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Gjenuine ambiguity requires more than a possible alternative construction.”); accord United States v. Flemming, 617 F.3d 252 , 272 (3d Cir.2010) (noting that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whoever, during and in relation to any [terrorism offense] knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of an other person or a false identification document shall in addition to the punishment provided for such felony, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 5 years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e have always reserved lenity for those situations in which a reasonable doubt persists about a statute's intended scope even after resort to the language and structure, legislative history, and motivating policies of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.