Teti v. Bender’s Empirical Analysis
507 F.3d 50 · 2007
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 33 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Thomas v. Horn (2009), Wilson v. Sirmons (2008)
41 federal appellate · 33 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miller-El v. Cockrell Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division · Williams v. Taylor · Townsend v. Sain · Cuyler v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a determination of a factual issue made by a State court”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he 'presumption of correctness is equally applicable when a state appellate court, as opposed to a state trial court, makes the finding of fact.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Martinez v. Ryan · Rivera v. Wall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.