Ingram v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
507 F.3d 640 · 2007
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2025
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1746
Relies on Houston v. Lack · Gaines v. Lane · United States v. Ceballos-Martinez · Grady v. United States · United States v. Craig
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f an institution has a system designed for legal mail, the inmate must use that system to receive the benefit of this rale. Timely filing may be shown by a declaration in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746 or by a notarized statement, either of which must set forth the date of deposit and state that first-class postage has been prepaid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.