Does v. Munoz’s Empirical Analysis
507 F.3d 961 · 2007
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Lambert v. Hartman (2008), Grinter v. Knight (2008)
7 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Paul v. Davis · Washington v. Glucksberg · Moore v. City of East Cleveland · Reno v. Flores · Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he interests in privacy fade when the information involved already appears on the public record.”); Does v. Munoz, 507 F.3d 961 , 965 (6th Cir.2007) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nunez v. Pachman“deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.