Newberry v. O'Connell’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 152 (§ 2 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 186 (§ 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc. · Danti v. Lewis · Lillian Yanks Rehmar v. Bernard L. Smith · Moglia v. Geoghegan · Gordon v. ILWU-PMA Benefit Funds
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The statutory requirement that there be a written agreement before contributions can be made ... [does not] ... require the contributing employer to actually sign the agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.