Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 NW2D 393 - State v. Edwards

State v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 2018

7 state decisions

30199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pate v. Robinson · Illinois v. Allen · Drope v. Missouri · Jones v. State · State v. Kempf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If at any stage of a criminal proceeding it reasonably appears that the defendant is suffering from a mental disorder which prevents the defendant from appreciating the charge, understanding the proceedings, or assisting effectively in the defense, further proceedings must be suspended and a hearing had upon that question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) Cite the defendant for contempt. (2) Take the defendant out of the courtroom until the defendant promises to behave properly. (3) Bind and gag the defendant, thereby keeping the defendant present.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.