Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 P2D 1330 - Sizemore v. State

Sizemore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
November 1987
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 7 Okla. Crim. 590 - Watson v. State · 72 Okla. Crim. 339 - Blumhoff v. State · Sanders v. State · Rider v. State · 89 Okla. Crim. 6 - Turpen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Where the sufficiency of the evidence to corroborate an accomplice is challenged, Court of Criminal Appeals will take the strongest view of the corroborating testimony that such testimony will warrant, and, if it can say that there is corroborating evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense, it will uphold the verdict.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.