Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 P2D 556 - Guthrey v. State

Guthrey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
May 1995
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 1995

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

150197319801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Ventresca · Leonard v. State · Sturgeon v. State · Riggs v. State · Berkshire v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““1. An affidavit for a search warrant based upon information received from a reliable informant should state the length of time the affiant has known the informant; that his reputation for truth and veracity was good; and that on a number of occasions past the informant has furnished information to the affiant which had been accurate. “2. The affidavit should then set forth general instances in which the informant had previously furnished correct information. “3. The affidavit should further state whether the informant himself observed the presence of contraband or articles to be seized upon the premises stating the date of the observation or that the belief of the reliable informant is based upon admission of one of the principals maintaining or keeping such contraband or articles on the premises.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Gamble v. State · Bennett v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.