Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 507 P2D 932 - Carter v. State

Carter v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2005

6 state decisions

501973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 6 Okla. Crim. 350 - Sharp v. United States · Martinez v. State · 4 Okla. Crim. 336 - Robison v. United States · Perkins v. State · 58 Tex. Crim. 261 - Owen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law recognizes that a person is privileged to defend a third person from harm under the same conditions and by the same means as though under and by which he is privileged to defend himself, if he reasonably believes that the circumstances are such as to give the third person such a privilege of self-defense, his intervention is necessary for the protection of the third person, and the third person is a member of his immediate family or a person whom he is under a legal or socially recognized duty to protect. ‘One who goes to the aid of a relative or third peson acts at his own peril, and his right to defend the other is coextensive with the other’s right to defend himself at the time.’ (Citations omitted). When an officer in making a lawful arrest uses more force or aggression than is reasonably necessary, the party so assaulted has the right of self-defense and may repel the attack with sufficient force to avert its threatened consequences, using no more force than is necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.