Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

507 So. 2d 1224

507 So.2d 1224

12 Fla.L.Weekly 1407

Bland v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1987-06-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1988

1 state decisions

Relies on 461 So. 2d 1003 - Davis v. State · 502 So. 2d 955 - State v. McCarthy · 498 So. 2d 1006 - Henry v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-06-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

COWART, Judge.

¶1The defendant plead guilty to lewd assault (§ 800.04, Fla.Stat.) and waived his right to be sentenced under the guidelines.1 The lower court sentenced him to 15 years’ incarceration, ordering that after the defendant serves 9 years of that term, he is to be placed in a community control program “for a period of remainder not to exceed 15 years.” This would mean community control for a period of six years or longer if the nine year incarceration is reduced by gain time or for any other reason.

¶2Pursuant to section 948.01, Florida Statutes, the duration of community control cannot exceed two years. There is no exemption for “split sentences” in which community control is used in lieu of probation. Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resen-tencing. See Davis v. State, 461 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

¶3SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.

¶4. Though the defendant does not raise this question, we note that at least one court has held that 1) guidelines sentencing cannot be waived and 2) a waiver of guideline sentencing is not a clear and convincing reason for departure. State v. McCarthy, 502 So.2d 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Henry v. State, 498 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

/507/so2d/1224 · .json · Public domain