Cantrell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

cited by 31 later decisions

states following

August 2016

most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably 684 So. 2d 643 - Davis v. State (1996), 684 So. 2d 625 - Hunter v. State (1996)

31 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 451 So. 2d 743 - Neal v. State · 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 378 So. 2d 640 - Coleman v. State · 380 So. 2d 1276 - Gathright v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“The rule in this state is that an indictment which states the statutory language is generally sufficient to inform the accused of the charge against him.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. Banks v. State · 741 So. 2d 246 - Morgan v. State
“A judge is required to disqualify himself if a reasonable person, knowing all the circumstances, would harbor doubts about his impartiality.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 587 So. 2d 892 - Buchanan v. Buchanan · 859 So. 2d 1006 - Johnson v. Gray
“The range of external circumstances from which probable bias may be inferred is infinite... . Exact concrete rules are almost impossible to formulate and where possible are usually undesirable. In general, these circumstances should have some clearly apparent force, as tested by experience of human nature, or, as it is usually put they not be too remote.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 661 So. 2d 1139 - Tillis v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.