507 So. 2d 630 - Rose v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2019
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stirone v. United States · Cole v. State of Arkansas · 438 So. 2d 1 - Palmer v. State · 403 So. 2d 956 - Ray v. State · Markham v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is elementary that the conviction of a crime not charged violates constitutional due process as well as the constitutional right of the accused in all criminal cases to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him. The violation of such constitutional rights constitutes fundamental error and is presumptively prejudicial and most certainly not within the discretion of any judge to permit.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“An attempted robbery of ... any one person is a distinctly different factual event and crime from an attempted robbery of ... any other person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jacob v. State“material variance between the name alleged, and that proved, is fatal”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jacob v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.