507 So. 2d 697 - Fixel Enterprises, Inc. v. Theis’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 472 So. 2d 1177 - CU Associates, Inc. v. RB Grove, Inc. · 242 So. 2d 464 - Sharpe v. Ceco Corporation · SCM Associates, Inc. v. Rhodes · 344 So. 2d 871 - Monde Invest No 2 v. Rd Taylor-Made Enter. · 498 So. 2d 1377 - NCN Elec., Inc. v. Leto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“IS THE DEFINITION IMPOSED UPON THE TERM "PREVAILING PARTY" AS USED IN SECTION 713.29, FLORIDA STATUTES, IN C.U. ASSOCIATES, INC. V.R.B. GROVE, INC., 472 So.2d 1177 (FLA. 1985), TO BE EXTENDED BEYOND THE CONTEXT OF THAT STATUTE.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“11. ATTORNEY'S AND COSTS: In connection with any litigation arising out of this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive all costs incurred, including reasonable attorney fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“does not involve the Mechanics' Lien law, which is codified in chapter 713, Florida Statutes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.